MPPSC Assistant Professor Recruitment: No General Category Posts for Two Subjects, Allegations of Discrimination

The recruitment process for Assistant Professors by the Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission (MPPSC) has sparked controversy and raised questions, particularly concerning the exclusion of General category candidates in two key subjects—Commerce and Hindi. In the recent notification for Assistant Professor vacancies, MPPSC has failed to allocate even a single position for candidates belonging to the General category in these two subjects. This has led to allegations of discrimination and has prompted candidates to voice their concerns about the fairness of the recruitment process.

Lack of General Category Positions in Commerce and Hindi

In the MPPSC’s Assistant Professor recruitment advertisement, vacancies were announced for multiple subjects across various categories. However, when the list of vacancies was released for the Commerce and Hindi subjects, it became evident that no positions had been designated for the General category. This anomaly has caused confusion among candidates who had anticipated a fair distribution of vacancies based on the availability of posts.

The absence of any General category posts in these two subjects has raised questions about the recruitment process and its transparency. Candidates from the General category, who typically form the bulk of the applicants, are especially concerned as they feel discriminated against by the decision to not allocate any positions to them. The fact that positions are available only under reserved categories—such as OBC (Other Backward Classes), SC (Scheduled Castes), and ST (Scheduled Tribes)—has been met with widespread dissatisfaction.

Allegations of Discrimination

Following the announcement, candidates from the General category have expressed their displeasure, claiming that the decision is unfair and discriminatory. They argue that such actions go against the principles of equal opportunity and fairness in the recruitment process. Many candidates have taken to social media platforms and other forums to voice their concerns, with some even demanding a review of the recruitment guidelines.

Critics argue that the absence of General category posts in these subjects is not just an oversight, but a sign of systemic discrimination. According to them, every candidate, irrespective of their caste or category, should have an equal chance to apply for positions, and no subject should be entirely restricted from General category candidates. They also pointed out that the recruitment process should be based on merit and the number of available posts in each subject, without bias or unjust exclusion.

Response from MPPSC

In response to the allegations, the MPPSC has not yet provided a detailed explanation for the lack of General category positions in Commerce and Hindi. However, officials have clarified that the recruitment process follows the guidelines set by the state government and the reservation policy. According to the state’s reservation policy, certain subjects may have fewer or no vacancies available for the General category, as the distribution of posts is often based on the number of candidates and the available pool of reserved category applicants.

MPPSC also highlighted that the recruitment process aims to ensure representation of all sections of society in various fields, and the allocation of positions is done keeping in mind the government’s objective of social justice and equality. However, this explanation has not satisfied the candidates, who feel that the General category has been unfairly sidelined, particularly in these two popular subjects.

Legal and Ethical Concerns

The controversy has also raised questions about the legal and ethical considerations surrounding the recruitment process. Legal experts argue that while reservation policies are important for promoting social equity, they should not result in the exclusion of any group from access to public employment opportunities. The principles of merit-based recruitment and equal opportunity for all candidates are fundamental aspects of a fair recruitment process.

Moreover, candidates from the General category are questioning whether such decisions are in line with constitutional provisions, which emphasize fairness and equality in public services. While reservation is meant to correct historical injustices and provide opportunities to marginalized communities, it is important that the process does not inadvertently create new forms of discrimination.

Conclusion

The MPPSC Assistant Professor recruitment controversy over the exclusion of General category candidates in Commerce and Hindi has become a significant issue, with allegations of bias and discrimination gaining traction. The recruitment body must address these concerns and offer a clear explanation of the reasoning behind the lack of General category positions. It is essential that the recruitment process is transparent, fair, and in line with the principles of equality and merit, ensuring that all eligible candidates, regardless of their category, have an equal opportunity to apply and compete for positions.